Finding funding through NSF

I was having lunch with a grad student friend the other day, and I casually mentioned ‘DEB’ while we were chatting. “What’s that?” Asked my friend. I was sort of surprised, because my companion was a top-notch fifth year grad student. But then I remembered that for most of the time I was a grad student, I too only had a vague idea of what the National Science Foundation (NSF) is (“the place grants come from”) and how the grants got from there to my advisors’ university accounts.

If your plan is to pursue science research in the U.S. — especially in academia, but also if you’re considering the non-profit world — you really ought to know how to find and apply for money from NSF. And probably it’s better to know this before you actually need that money so you don’t accidentally miss a good opportunity. I’ve never heard of anyone being offered a course called “NSF 101”, so this is one of the many things you’re just supposed to magically pick up along the way. Hopefully I can make it a little easier for you, if you’re still a bit fuzzy about the process.

(The National Science Foundation funds much of U.S. ecological research. It should be noted, however, that many other government agencies and non-governmental organizations also fund U.S. ecological research. And, of course, many many other countries fund ecological research, too. For this post, I’ll just focus on NSF, which is the agency with which I’m most familiar.)

First, the big picture. NSF is made up of 7 major grant-giving units, called directorates, and each has a acronym by which they are commonly referred. The directorates cover biological sciences (BIO), computer and information sciences (CISE), education (EHR), engineering (ENG), geosciences (GEO), math and physics (MPS), and the social sciences (SBE). Within each directorate, there are 3 to 6 divisions. Each of these also has an acronym (of course).

The divisions most generally relevant to ecology are the Division of Environmental Biology (DEB) and Division of Integrative Organismal Systems (IOS), both within the BIO directorate. IOS funds research at the organismal level — research that addresses the question of “why organisms are structured the way they are and function as they do.” DEB funds research on “populations, species, communities, and ecosystems.” Both of these divisions have an annual pre-proposal deadline in January, so if you’re wondering where everyone has disappeared to in the next couple weeks, they’re writing — or putting finishing touches on — NSF proposals to DEB or IOS.

You also might be wondering: what the heck is a “pre-proposal” anyway? The short answer is that it’s a short-form proposal intended to give a basic idea of what research is being proposed. Pre-proposals are evaluated, and the top ones are invited to submit “full proposals”. These full proposals are longer and include additional parts, such as budgets. DEB and IOS evaluate the pre-proposals by sometime in May and then invited teams submit their full proposals by early August. Decisions on these full proposals happen in November or December.

This pre-proposal/full-proposal system for IOS and DEB is relatively new. It began in 2013 in response to high reviewer loads and the onus of a twice yearly full proposal cycle. There are definitely benefits and drawbacks to each system, and I think the jury is still out as to whether the new system is a Good Thing, a Bad Thing, or just different.

In most other divisions and directorates of NSF, there aren’t pre-proposals. You simply submit a full proposal, with deadlines happening once or twice per year (or occasionally more often).

In addition to the main request for proposals (RFP) that each division puts out, there are a multitude of special offers and cross-disciplinary offers. For example, the Emerging Frontiers division within BIO is currently funding macrosystems biology research. DEB and two geosciences divisions co-sponser the Long-Term Ecological Research network. And a cross-NSF effort is now funding data science research that involves innovative computer science or statistics and a “domain” science such as ecology.

And how do you learn about all these offerings? As an early career person, I’ve found it very difficult to know what’s even out there. I think that once you’ve succeeded in getting a grant from NSF, you get on their email list and they just directly email you with opportunities. (Correct me if I’m wrong.) But I’ve generally found out about opportunities through (1) mailing lists; and (2) happenstance, from colleagues who mention an opportunity to me in passing. I’ve tried browsing the NSF web pages, but found it very difficult because there is SO much information on there, it’s spaghetti-linked, and there’s a lot of legacy material that isn’t germane to finding funding. Plus, there are new opportunities coming out all the time.

Last summer I discovered that you can subscribe to NSF announcements, including funding opportunities. You can pick and choose which ones you want to receive. I personally signed up to get weekly digests (so I’m not inundated) of every funding opportunity NSF releases. Each week I skim through and see what NSF is funding. It’s interesting. But more importantly, I see opportunities that I might not have encountered otherwise — especially things that might fund interdisciplinary research involving ecology and computing, for example, or ecology and citizen science.

Wait, why should I care? I’m just a postdoc after all. Well, NSF just doesn’t offer much specifically for ecology postdocs. When I started researching postdoc opportunities as a fifth-year grad student, I was surprised (and horrified) to discover that the vaunted NSF postdoc fellowships are only offered in a very narrow range of subjects — none of them applicable to me. If you want to do postdoctoral research of your choosing, your only funding option from NSF is to write a regular proposal in collaboration with a mentor. It’s a lot of work. But it’s an excellent learning experience, especially if you expect your future to involve getting your own grants.

Permanent link to this article: http://ecologybits.com/index.php/2016/01/06/finding-funding-through-nsf/

Ecology Bits is launched!

Ecology Bits is launched! It’s been a long time in coming. I’ve been wanting to blog for the professional ecological community for years, but there have been stumbling blocks. To be fair, the major one was myself: not for lack of commitment so much as being very picky when it comes to design. I dreamed up a design and then asked a friend and professional artist if she could bring it to fruition. The cost of professional design turned out to be above what I could justify on a grad student stipend and with a child to support. So the idea languished.

And then I ran out of time to write blog posts anyway. Despite some people always being able to find a time to blog, I think that’s only really true if (1) your life is stable; or (2) you don’t have dependents with intensive needs. I was finishing my dissertation while scrapping for the last bit of money to support myself (and the requisite childcare expenses I needed to finish). Simultaneously, I was also trying to find a postdoc position. That happened, and then I needed to uproot my family of three across the country (yet again), and start a new job. Oh yeah, and I was pregnant. New job. Move. New home. New childcare. New doctors. New neighbors. Reregistering. Finding the new stores. It all takes a lot of time. Then there was a new baby.

I find that each move costs me about 2 months of productivity. Each baby costs me between 1-2 year’s worth. When I’m running deficit on work time and family time is saturated, I can’t justify writing blog posts. I must sleep in the only time I have left.

But now it’s a year and a half post-birth, and life is starting to take on a semblance of normal – whatever that means. One thing is clear: my work time is less infringed upon by breastfeeding and pumping needs. And that means some interstitial times in which to blog again.

I say ‘again’ because I am not new to blogging. My introduction to blogging began with a conversation in college back in the 1990’s. I was on a long evening walk, as one is in college, with a guy I had recently met. Or rather talked to. I had known of his existence for some time as his social circles of computer science and theater overlapped mine. And he told me that he kept a journal. Online. So anyone could read it. This seemed weird to me, and intriguing. I had kept a journal for many years. In a book on paper. Where only I could read it. Why would someone keep an open journal? Of course, I checked it out as soon as I got back to my room. And I loved it. Well, I loved reading it. But I had no intention to write my own.

After I graduated from college, a friend of mine and I took a trip around Europe for a summer. But not the standard train-and-hostel trip; we biked. We biked and biked and eventually logged 1,000 miles. We had lots of adventures and I recorded them in my journal. When I got back to the U.S. and started a dreary 9-5 job, I typed them all up, added pictures and ‘published’ the journey on CD for family.

A few years later I was living and working in Germany. And I had not only the national Germany holidays off and the local Bavarian ones, but I also had the U.S. holidays off. And I had a lot of vacation. In other words, I had a lot of free time and I spent it all traveling. This time, my adventures went directly to computer. It was now 2003 and the Internet had taken off, and by posting my pictures and writings publicly, I could keep in better contact with my family. It was my first official blog, even though that term hadn’t become mainstream yet. And it was manually formatted in HTML.

After my stint in Germany, I worked on a farm in Wisconsin for a year. Again, I blogged the experience, to the enjoyment of my family and friends. They told me that they really enjoyed reading my writing, so I kept on doing it.

I continued writing for a while after that, but found that without a theme to tie my writing to, it wasn’t as compelling to read or interesting to write. That blog petered out and I stopped blogging all together.

I picked up blogging again when I was pregnant with my first son in 2009. I was in the midst of a Ph.D. program at the University of Minnesota and all my family and most of my friends were elsewhere in the country and world. They wanted to know what was going on. I also had a keen desire to capture the fleeting moments of this new adventure. I blogged for about two and a half years – with a major focus on pictures and video – until a cross-country move interrupted the flow.

Around the time the baby blog was petering out, a colleague and I were developing an ecology citizen science project in collaboration with the online platform Zooniverse. Called Snapshot Serengeti, it launched in December 2012, asking volunteers to identify species in camera trap photos from the Serengeti in Tanzania. Along with the site itself, we started a blog to answer volunteer questions and provide a glimpse to the volunteers of what the “professionals” (we were both grad students at the time) did behind the scenes. This was fun because it was the first time I had an audience other than my family and friends. I wrote about Serengeti ecology and about the data analysis I was doing with the data the volunteers produced. I got comments. I answered questions. I learned that the people who bothered to comment on the blog were really interested in the project and smart. It’s been a great experience.

My blogging these past couple years has been more sporadic. I write for the Snapshot Serengeti blog on occasion. I write for a blog I started in conjunction with a new citizen science project called Season Spotter. And I guest blog for Dynamic Ecology from time to time.

I really enjoy Dynamic Ecology for both its range of content as well as its comment discussions. It’s arguably the most widely read ecology blog focusing on the culture and practice of professional ecology. I also regularly read Small Pond Science, Tenure She Wrote, Gravity’s Rainbow, and The Contemplative Mammoth. And, like many, Female Science Professor was my gateway blog into reading academic blogs.

I’m happy to start up my own academic blog now. It means that I’ll have an outlet for the bazillion things I write or want to write. And maybe I’ll even have a few readers. And generally, posts will be shorter than this one. I have a lot of opinions about design, as I mentioned. One thing I believe is that most blog posts ought to be kept to about 500 words. But since no one reads the very first post of a blog, I’m safe with this one. (You’re not reading this, are you?) And while I’m not head-over-heels in love with the current blog design, it’s good enough for now.

You might think that, given the timing, starting this blog is a New Year’s resolution. It’s not really. I don’t save my resolutions for a specific time of year. But I do happen to have a little bit of extra time right now to get over the activation energy hump of starting a blog. My goal for 2016 is #50posts– about one blog post per week for a year. My secret goal is to get picked up by Dynamic Ecology’s Friday links at least once a month.

Content will be ecology-centric, with some focus on the computer, algorithms, and statistical side of (ecological) data analysis. I was a computer scientist before I became an ecologist. Also diversity stuff, because when you’re a tech-phile and math-phile and female and a parent, it’s hard to avoid. And citizen science, because it’s fun and important. And likely many thoughts on the academic system and on being a postdoc within it. And advice for other postdocs and for grad students. Enjoy!

Permanent link to this article: http://ecologybits.com/index.php/2015/12/29/ecology-bits-is-launched/

» Newer posts