{"id":30,"date":"2016-01-18T06:00:32","date_gmt":"2016-01-18T11:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/?p=30"},"modified":"2016-01-13T11:22:37","modified_gmt":"2016-01-13T16:22:37","slug":"analysis-preregistration-gets-a-big-boost-in-the-form-of-a-million-dollars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/2016\/01\/18\/analysis-preregistration-gets-a-big-boost-in-the-form-of-a-million-dollars\/","title":{"rendered":"Analysis preregistration gets a big boost in the form of a million dollars"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Center for Open Science has recently issued <a href=\"https:\/\/cos.io\/prereg\/\" target=\"_blank\">The $1,000,000 Preregistration Challenge<\/a>. What is preregistration? Briefly, the idea is to reduce &#8220;researcher degrees of freedom.&#8221; Researchers often explore their data and then make data-processing and analytical choices based on the data that will be analyzed. But this can lead to biased results and incorrect scientific inference. Recent meta-studies have found a surprisingly high level of non-reproducibility in psychology and biomed, and this has no doubt spurred increased interest in techniques that can potentially make studies more reproducible. And preregistration is one such technique.<\/p>\n<p>When I first heard of preregistration, I thought, &#8220;huh, well, sure, I guess in theory that would be a good thing to do.&#8221; But I also thought, &#8220;why would I do that? It&#8217;s quite a bit of extra work and doing so won&#8217;t benefit me in any way.&#8221; Like all of us, my time is limited and very valuable. I do cost-benefit analyses all the time on whether or not to do things. And preregistration wasn&#8217;t even close to the break-even line.<\/p>\n<p>But this Preregistration Challenge may tip the scales for me. $1,000 is not to be scoffed at. And 1,000 recipients isn&#8217;t a small number of awards. I have a major new project coming up that I haven&#8217;t yet started analyses on. And the timeline for awards distribution seems quite reasonable. (In other words, the awards won&#8217;t all be won by projects that are fast and in disciplines that have fast publishing turn-around times.)<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s pretty clear that for preregistration to become the norm, academic culture will need to change. And cultural change is hard. This challenge is a neat way to get a lot of people to experiment with a new practice that they likely wouldn&#8217;t have bothered with otherwise.<\/p>\n<p>Oh wait.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll take it all back. There&#8217;s a list of &#8216;eligible&#8217; journals one can publish results in. And I assumed this list was just to vet journal repute &#8212; i.e. you can&#8217;t win if you publish in a journal that doesn&#8217;t actually do peer-review. But the list is actually journals that are open science friendly. And ecology journals are poorly represented on the list. Which is a problem, of course. But nudging ecology journals towards more open practices is not something I have the time or energy for. Boo. Maybe I&#8217;ll preregister and hope that by the time I publish, there are more ecology journals on the list.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Center for Open Science has recently issued The $1,000,000 Preregistration Challenge. What is preregistration? Briefly, the idea is to reduce &#8220;researcher degrees of freedom.&#8221; Researchers often explore their data and then make data-processing and analytical choices based on the data that will be analyzed. But this can lead to biased results and incorrect scientific &hellip; <\/p>\n<p><a class=\"more-link block-button\" href=\"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/2016\/01\/18\/analysis-preregistration-gets-a-big-boost-in-the-form-of-a-million-dollars\/\">Continue reading &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-open-science","nodate"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p77WvP-u","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31,"href":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30\/revisions\/31"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ecologybits.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}